Wildcat Cub-2 Moderator review | Moderators and Suppressors Reviews

The official website for Gun Mart Magazine, What Gun? and Shooting Sports Magazine.

Wildcat Cub-2 Moderator

By: Jules Whicker

Wildcat offered their original Cub a few years ago, made from Delrin it was only for 22 Hornet and less. Last year they launched the Cub-2, which bridges the gap between the magnum rimfires and smaller centrefires; 204, 222 and 223. This necessitated a re-think on construction as it’s now made from aluminium alloy and shows a different internal design.

Small but practical

It measures 167 x 35 mm making it larger than the original. This puts it roughly in the same ball park as Wildcat’s Growler and Whisper rimfires. However at 240-grams the Cub-2 is around half the weight and size of comparable centrefire moderators and though very much in a calibre class, still offers near rimfire proportions for smaller centrefire needs.

The design unscrews for cleaning and shows three components: muzzle cap, one-piece baffle-stack/end-cap and outer sleeve, all sealed by O-rings. The seven baffles are convex, thereby deflecting more gas away from the bore and trapping it in each expansion chamber, and absorbing the maximum possible energy at every stage. The resulting profile is pretty easy to clean too.

Field testing

I tried it out with four calibres; 22 WMR .22 Hornet, 222 and 223 Remington. The latter is obviously a higher-pressure round than the .222 for which it was proofed. However, designer Andrew Banner assured me that the difference between the two (a S.A.A.M.I. maximum of 50,000psi as opposed to 55,000psi) wasn’t critical, and the Cub-2 would hold up just fine – which it has.

For control I used an Ase Utra CQB, because its modest internal volume ensured it wouldn’t be over-capacity for any of the calibres and I know it to be an effective design. I wasn’t surprised to find the CQB outdid the Cub-2 on each of the cartridges. Does this mean you should buy a CQB? That depends on whether sound reduction is your only criterion: because even though the CQB is smaller its extra 300g at the muzzle is hard to ignore. So if you have a light rifle and want to keep it that way, or one that’s already heavy enough, I’d go for the Cub-2.

What about the Cub-2’s performance with comparable Wildcat moddies? Well, those present all reckoned it did a marginally better job on the 22 WMR than either the Whisper or Growler, and although the extra 40g was felt, it wasn’t regarded as a problem. So if you shoot a magnum rimfire and a small centrefire it will do double duty.

Gun Mart Shooters Forum - Get Involved in the Discussion!

In conclusion

The Cub-2 is well-made, with a simple but advanced design that makes it light, relatively compact and easy to clean. It also does what it was designed to do; by providing 22Hornet and 222 shooters with a moderator that ably meets the demands of these cartridges with a minimal effect on handling.

For: Compact and well made design
Against: Perhaps a bit stretched with 222 compared to other designs
Verdict: In its calibre class a true lightweight option

All Prices Are Guides Due to the Changes in US & European Exchange Rates

This review has 2 comments

Gun Mart Classifieds

User Comments

Hi.

Great Website!

I was wondering how this would go on a .204? Also, do you think a .204 with say a 24" barrel would be easier to moderate than say a 20" barrel (less muzzle blast)?

Is a .204 harder to moderate than a .222 or .223?

Thanks,

Colyn

Comment by: Colyn Posted on: 12 Feb 2011 at 05:48 PM
The 204 uses a 222 Magnum case and so offers a larger powder capacity than either 222 or 223 Rem, so might stretch the CUB-2 a bit more than is sensible. A longer barrel should to a degree be easier to moderate as more powder is being burned in the barrel and there would be less muzzle blast too. To be honest and though th CUB-2 seems a good design it is probably too small for much over 22 Hornet...

Comment by: peter moore Posted on: 14 Feb 2011 at 08:20 AM

Keep it polite and on topic. Your email address will not be published. Please do not advertise products, all posts of this nature will be removed. We do not stock or supply any of these products, we independently review these products.

Brand New - Video Reviews