I acknowledge the innovation and the engineering skill in creating this, but it is, in my view ill-advised.
We are literally a few months after the ban of MARS and Lever Release Section 1 rifles. The government determined that the rate of fire and magazine capacity were, amongst other reasons, too high for civilians to own, and so they banned them.
Now, a rifle is introduced, that has a high rate of fire, high magazine capacity and allows for fast magazine changes. The risk is obvious and in my view, high. This rifle endangers every centrefire gallery rifle. I hope it is withdrawn from the market
Comments
<a href=https://vslasixv.com>lasix generic online
gunteew
18 Jun 2021 at 05:44 PM<a href=https://clomidset.com>where can i buy clomid over the counter
gunteew
12 Jun 2021 at 10:24 AM<a href=https://priligyset.com/>priligy belgique prix
gunteew
09 Jun 2021 at 04:01 AMI have some concerns about how sensible this is.
I acknowledge the innovation and the engineering skill in creating this, but it is, in my view ill-advised.
We are literally a few months after the ban of MARS and Lever Release Section 1 rifles. The government determined that the rate of fire and magazine capacity were, amongst other reasons, too high for civilians to own, and so they banned them.
Now, a rifle is introduced, that has a high rate of fire, high magazine capacity and allows for fast magazine changes. The risk is obvious and in my view, high. This rifle endangers every centrefire gallery rifle. I hope it is withdrawn from the market
Steve Ward
29 Jan 2021 at 08:50 PM